White Columns Online #1:
Full House
curated by Elizaveta Shneyderman
January 14–March 4, 2017 OnlineDolly Faibyshev
Orange Lady and Boxer, 2010
Photography
20 × 40 in.
Courtesy of the artist
Dustin London
One Year, 2016
Oil on canvas
42 × 35 in.
Courtesy of the artist
Paul Rouphail
Rondo, 2016
Oil on linen
35.25 × 49 in.
Courtesy of the artist
Toru Hayashi
Equivocal Landscape Vol. 63-45/8.12.2014
Micro pigment ink on paper
5.9 × 8.25 in.
Courtesy of the artist
Paul Rouphail
Schematic (1, 2, 3, 4), 2016
Gouache on paper in artist’s frame
22.5 × 22.5 in.
Courtesy of the artist and Smart Objects, Los Angeles
Tatyana Gubash
“The Great Indoors”, 2016
Oil on linen
12 × 12 in.
Courtesy of the artist
Grant Foster
Porc, 2016
Collage, glue, pigment on canvas
80x70cm
Courtesy of the artist
Alex Ito
I’ve Only Ever Known Evil, 2016
Mechanical mannequin, glass, wood, aluminum, resin
Dimensions variable
Courtesy of the artist
Jonathan Ehrenberg
Still from ‘Bad Tools’, 2016
HD video
2:37 minutes
Courtesy of the artist
Gary Preston Schmitt
You Are Out There All Alone, 2016
Wood, vinyl, embroidery
90 in. × 43 in. × 18.5 in.
Courtesy of the artist
Gary Preston Schmitt
You Are Out There All Alone (detail), 2016
Wood, vinyl, embroidery
90 in. × 43 in. × 18.5 in.
Courtesy of the artist
Christian Weidner
LION Killer !, 2016
Mixed media collage
25 × 38 cm
Courtesy of the artist
Christian Weidner
contemporary girl power, 2014
Oil / Paper on canvas
37 × 18 cm
Courtesy of the artist
Exhibition Description
Full House is an amalgam of mangled forms, an online inventory concerned with “Thingification”. To quote feminist-informed theorist Karen Barad:
Thingification—the turning of relations into “things,” “entities,” “relata”—infects much of the way we understand the world and our relationship to it. Why do we think that the existence of relations requires relata? Does the persistent distrust of nature, materiality, and the body that pervades much of contemporary theorizing and a sizable amount of the history of Western thought feed off of this cultural proclivity? (Barad, Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter, pg. 130)
Trend forecasters correctly predicted the era of post-postmodern symbolic relata to end in 2042. That year, the Westminster Kennel Club released a new set of breed standards accounting for the seventeen new American Pit Bull Terrier-based breeds. The unanticipated difficulty of phenotype mapping in domestic dogs has led to an increase in genetic activism; protestors with signs that read “BREEDING IS RUFF, MY MUTT IS PAWFECT” and “EUGENICS IS MUTILATING OUR BEST FRIENDS” gather around kennel clubs across the continent to spurn pedigree. Pro-Mix party manifestos begin: Given that language historically configures human subjectivity in the legacy of the West, nonhuman agency emerges out of irony! Historical evidence suggests the activists are barking up the wrong tree.
Still, the Pro-Mix manifesto sounds more infatuated with jargon than concerned about pup-goodwill:
Discernment consistently renders a subject, a subject.
Any apparatus for seeing deserves scrutiny.
The apparatus of seeing has the potential to refute theoretical exclusivity if being empathic is conflated with making assumptions!
An empathy infrastructure may henceforth consider this componentry: assumptions all over the place bodies in space.
Others are not actors. Dogs are not surrogates. To be especially concerned at the precise intersection of language and signification is to consider exchange in its symbolic processes, to do due diligence to arbitrary factors. Still, it’s not quite right.
– Elizaveta Shneyderman
Elizaveta Shneyderman is an independent curator, artist, writer living in New York.
This exhibition is the first in a series of online exhibitions; this exhibition was curated exclusively from White Columns’ Artists Registry.
For more information: registry.whitecolumns.org